IN THE COURT
OF LEARNED SESSION JUDGE, KASUR
Riasat Ali S/O Muhammad Riaz Alis Raju Caste Rajput R/O Basti
Qadir Abad, Kasur City, Kasur
Versus
i.
The
State
ii.
Mst.
Naseem Akhter W/O Muhammad Ishaque Caste Rajput R/O Basti Qadir Abad, Kasur
City, Kasur.
Case FIR No. 910/12 Dated: 19.10.2012
U/S 302,452,337A(i),A(ii), A(iv), L(ii), F(i), F(iii), F(v), 148/149 PPC ,
Police Station, Saddar Kasur.
PETITION U/S 497 CR.PC FOR GRANT OF POST-ARREST BAIL
Respectfully Shewth,
1.
That
the above captioned FIR has been lodged on the instance of respondent No. 2.
2.
That
the case has been lodged with malafide intention which is manifest from the
contents of the FIR, as
i.
Riaz
, ( father of the petitioner).
ii.
Yasir
iii.
Arslan
iv.
Sunny
v.
Ashfaq,
(Brothers of the Petitioner).
vi.
Aslam
vii.
Salamat
viii.
Niamat,
(Real Uncles of the Petitioner).
ix.
Meena
x.
Samina,
(Real Sisters of the Petitioner).
xi.
Sheema,
(Mother of the Petitioner).
xii.
Nazia
,(Wife of the Petitioner).
xiii.
Rabia
W/O Yasir
xiv.
Aisha
W/O Sunny, (Wives of Accused Brothers).
and all kith and kin of the
petitioner are named in the FIR along with 2 more unknown persons.
The widest net is thrown and none of
the family and kith and kin are spared.
3.
That
the role attributed to the petitioner is that he inflicted a TOKA blow on the
left leg of deceased Ishaque.
4.
That
the medical account does not bear out injuries with a sharp edged weapon like
TOKA on the leg of the deceased.
5.
That
the inquiry report reveals one injury on the calf of right leg while in post
mortem report, injury No.5 is a lacerated wound measuring 2cm*0.5cm present on front
of (R) lower leg 11cm below knee. Injuries No. 6 and 7 on the leg are
abrasions. Though the nature of injuries attracting certain penal provision is
not stated, however the description positively suggests that these are simple
in nature. That injury attributed to the petitioner is not particularly attributed
to the petitioner.
6.
That
the petitioner is behind the bars since 22.12.2012.
7.
That
in Crl.Misc No. 2451-B-2013, His lordship Mr. Justice Shahid Hameed Dar of the
Lahore High Court Lahore. While granting bail to Muhammad Tanvir and Abdul
Qayyum observed on 08.05.2013 in Para No.6. Annex. A
PARA No.6 “According to the contents of the FIR, the alleged
crime was committed by a mob consisting of 26 persons and in such a tumultuous
situation. Its look pretty hard that the individual act of any of the rioters
could be noticed by the complainant and other witnesses. The particular aspect
of the case however, can be better taken care of by the learned trail court
after recording of evidence of the parties during trial.”
8.
That
his lordship Mr. Justice Muhammad Farrakh Irfan Khan of the Lahore High court Lahore,
while granting bail to co-accused Arslam Ali and Yasir Ali observed on
30.07.2013 in of Cr.Misc No. 9084-B-2013 in Para No.5 Annexed. B, “the
unfortunate accordance turned into melee. As regards the petitioners they are
behind the bar since 22.12.2012 and 4.10.2013 repeatedly and in the facts and
circumstances of the case cannot be incarcerated for in definite period of
time. Their further detention would hardly serve any useful purpose for the prosecution.
Co-accused of the petitioner with somewhat identical role have already been granted
bail by the court. Mere reading of examination in chief of 9pws nowhere disentitled
the petitioners and can be treated a valid ground to withhold the grant of
bail. Investigation is complete. Challan has been submitted. Both the
petitioners are real brothers. They are no more required by investigation
agency for purpose of any further investigation.
For the afore going facts and reasons,
aparts from the applicability of role of consistency petitioners case also falls
with the ambit of provision 2 to section 497.
9.
(a).
that the present petitioner is also brother of the accused who have been
granted bail mentioned above. That on the body of deceased Muhammad Ishaque
there are seven injuries in the post mortem report and out of these 3 are on
the right leg one is lacerated wound and two are the abrasions, one injury is
attributed on the right legal of sharp edged weapon to the petitioner. Firstly
the injury is not supported by medical account and account of injuries as given
in FIR leads to the observation dated 08.05.2013 in Para No. 6 of Annex A, by
his lordship Mr. Justice Shahid Hameed Dar that crime was committed by mob
consisting of 26 persons and in such a tumultuous situation, it looks pretty
hard that the individual acts of any of the rioter could be notice by the
complainant and other witnesses.
10. That the case against the petitioner
is one of further inquiry.
11. That petitioner is not previous convict.
It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the instant bail
petition may kindly be accepted and petitioner may kindly be granted bail after
arrest till the final disposal of the case.
Petitioner: Through Counsel
No comments:
Post a Comment